Tafsir Saintifik dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an: Analisis Kritis atas Epistemologi dan Metodologinya

Authors

  • Isnan Ansory Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Dirosat Islamiyah Al-Hikmah
  • Muhammad Nur Kholis Institut Ilmu Al-Qur’an Jakarta

Keywords:

Scientific Tafsir, Cosmological Verses, Tafsir Criticism, Epistemology, and Methodology.

Abstract

Qur’anic studies that seeks to correlate cosmological verses (āyāt kauniyyah) with modern scientific discoveries. The study aims to clarify the nature of scientific exegesis, trace its historical development and key figures, and analyze the methodological, epistemological, theological, and contextual critiques directed at this approach. Employing a qualitative library research method, the study utilizes descriptive-analytical, critical-comparative, and hermeneutic-philosophical analyses of scientific tafsir works and their critiques. The findings indicate that scientific exegesis contributes positively to fostering dialogue between revelation and science and to strengthening faith through reflection on natural phenomena. Nevertheless, this approach entails significant methodological risks when scientific theories—being empirical and provisional—are treated as foundational interpretive frameworks. Therefore, the article emphasizes the necessity of a balanced approach that positions science as a reflective and complementary tool rather than a determinant of revelatory truth, thereby preserving the theological authority and spiritual depth of the Qur’an

References

Abdulloh Hanif. “Pembacaan Ilmiah Al-Qur’an: Kritik Nidhal Guessoum atas Teori I‘jāz.” KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin 12, no. 2 (2022): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.36781/kaca.v12i2.265.

Abdurrahman. “Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan dalam Pendidikan Islam.” Adabuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran 3, no. 2 (2024): 102–113. https://doi.org/10.38073/adabuna.v3i2.1563.

Ahmad Nabil Amir. “Pemikiran Tafsir Shaykh Muhammad Abduh.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin 20, no. 1 (2021): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v20i1.4126.

Afdilla Nisa Mohamad Fiqry Amhar. “Fenomena Kegelapan Dasar Laut Berdasarkan QS. an-Nūr [24]: 40 (Analisis Penafsiran Zaghlul al-Najjar).” Mu‘āṣarah: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer 6, no. 1 (2024): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.18592/msr.v6i2.15755.

Ajar Permono. “Kritik Metodologi Penafsiran Bucaillisme atas Ayat-Ayat Sains.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 19, no. 1 (2018): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-01.

Akhmad Supriadi. “Integrating Qur’an and Science: Epistemology of Tafsir Ilmi in Indonesia.” Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat 16, no. 2 (2017): 149–186. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v16i2.10191.

Al-Dzahabi, Muhammad Husain. al-Tafsīr wa al-Mufassirūn. Kairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Ḥadīthah, 1976.

Al-Syāṭibī. al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharī‘ah. Jil. II. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1997.

Al-Tirmidzi. Sunan al-Tirmidzi. Kitāb al-Tafsīr, hadis no. 2950.

Ali Muchasan. “Relasi Agama dan Sains.” Inovatif: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Agama, dan Kebudayaan 6, no. 1 (2020): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.55148/inovatif.v6i1.159.

Aris Saprudin. “Basis Epistemologi Tafsir Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd dan Implikasinya terhadap Desakralisasi Al-Qur’an.” Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 6 (2025): 4267–4282. https://doi.org/10.63822/2g8ht921.

Armainingsih. “Studi Tafsir Saintifik: al-Jawāhir fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm Karya Shaykh Tantawi Jauhari.” At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 1, no. 1 (2016): 94–117. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v1i1.34.

Dayan Fithoroini. “Hadis Nabi yang Tekstual dan Kontekstual (Analisis Pemikiran Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail).” Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies 2 (2021): 116–140. https://doi.org/10.55987/njhs.v2i1.42.

Fazlur Rahman. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Harun Yahya. Keajaiban Ilmiah dalam Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Harun Yahya Publications, 2002.

Imam Subchi. “Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd dan Gagasan Hermeneutika dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Mimbar Agama Budaya 36, no. 2 (2019): 145–157. https://doi.org/10.15408/mimbar.v36i2.14186.

M. Quraish Shihab. Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi dan Peran Wahyu dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Bandung: Mizan, 1992.

Moh. Anwar Syarifuddin Firdarini. “Corak ‘Ilmī Tafsir al-Miṣbāḥ.” Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 9, no. 1 (2023): 96–112. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v9i1.32241.

Muhammad Safar Gani. “Tafsir ‘Ilmi dalam Tafsir al-Maraghi: Studi Ayat-Ayat Juz ‘Amma.” Al-Mustafid: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 3, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.30984/mustafid.v3i2.1181.

Rd. Mulyadhi Kartanegara. “Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Telaah Kritis terhadap Epistemologi Barat.” Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat 1, no. 3 (1999): 149–162. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v1i3.14301.

Tesa Fitria Mawarti. “Tafsir Saintifik.” Jurnal Tafsere 10, no. 1 (2022): 10–29. https://doi.org/10.24252/jt.v10i1.35547.

Theo Jaka Prakoso. “Validitas Tafsīr bi al-‘Ilmī dalam Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Penciptaan Alam.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 21, no. 1 (2020): 67–88. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2101-04.

Zaglul al-Najjar. Min Āyāt al-I‘jāz al-‘Ilmī fī al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Kairo: Maktabah al-Shurūq al-Dauliyyah, 2007.

Zaprulkhan. “Membangun Relasi Agama dan Ilmu Pengetahuan.” Kalam 7, no. 2 (2013): 259–272. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v7i2.465

Downloads

Published

2026-05-03

How to Cite

Isnan Ansory, & Muhammad Nur Kholis. (2026). Tafsir Saintifik dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an: Analisis Kritis atas Epistemologi dan Metodologinya. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam , 7(1), 87–99. Retrieved from https://ejournal.iaifa.ac.id/index.php/takwiluna/article/view/2973