Kajian Kritik Sanad Atas Hadis Sepuluh Fitrah dalam Shahih Muslim: Sebuah Perspektif Metodologis
Keywords:
Critique; Isnad; Shahih Muslim.Abstract
This study aims to examine the quality of the chain of narrators (isnad) in Sahih Muslim by conducting an isnad critique on the hadith about the ten natural dispositions (fitrah) of human beings. The research method used in this paper is library research, which involves utilizing books as sources for data collection, as well as applying the method of takhrij al-hadith to trace the hadith. The findings and discussion in this study reveal that one narrator in Muslim’s transmission chain was identified as having memory issues. However, the narrator's weak memory does not affect their integrity in transmitting the hadith. Based on the research conducted, the author concludes that the isnad of the hadith narrated by Muslim regarding the ten natural dispositions of human beings is classified as ḥasan li gairihi (good due to corroborating evidence). This study recommends that academics further develop isnad critique research on narrations in Sahih Muslim.
References
Abū Dāud, Sulaimān ibn al-Asy’aṡ al-Sijistāniy al-Azdiy, Sunan Abū Dāud, ed. by ’Izzat ’Ubaid al-Da’ās and ’Ādil al-Sayyid (Beirūt: Dār Ibnu Hazm, 1997).
Al-Albāni, Abū Abdul al-Rahman Muhammad Nāsir al-Dīn, Silsilah Al-Aḥādīṡ Al-Ḍa’īfah Wa Al-Mauḍū’ah (Riyāḍ: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 1992).
———, Ṣaḥīḥ Sunan Abī Dāud (Kuwait: Mu’assasah Ghirās li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī‘, 2002).
Al-Hajjaj, Muslim bin, Al-Musnad Al-Sahih Al-Muktasar Bi Naql Al-Adl Ila Rasulullah Sallallah Alaihi Wa Sallam (Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turas al-Arabi).
Al-Miṣrī, Ibn al-Mulaqqin Sirājuddīn Abū Ḥafṣ ‘Umar bin ‘Alī bin Aḥmad al-Syāfi‘ī, al-Badr al-Munīr fī Takhrīj al-Aḥādīs wa al-Āshār al-Wāqi‘ah fī al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr (Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turas al-Arabi).
Al-Mizzi, Abu al-Hajjaj Yusuf bin ’Abd al-Rahman bin Yusuf Jamal al-Din, Tahzib Al-Kamal Fi Asma Al-Rijal, I (Beirūt: Muassasah al-Risālah, 1400).
Al-Nasā’iy, Abū ʻAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Syuʻaib ibn ʻAliy al-Khurrāsāniy, Al-Mujtabā Min Al-Sunan (Al-Sunan Al-Ṣugrā Li Al-Nassā’iy), 1st edn (Beirut: Maktabah al-Maṭbūʻāt al-Islāmiyyah, 1986).
Al-Tirmiżiy, Abū ʻĪsā Muḥammad ibn ʻĪsā ibn Saurah ibn Mūsā al-Ḍaḥḥak, Al-Jāmiʻ Al-Kabīr Sunan Al-Tirmiżiy, 2nd edn (Beirut: Dār al-Garb al-Islāmiy, 1998).
Al-Zayla‘ī, Jamāluddīn Abū Muḥammad ‘Abdullāh bin Yūsuf bin Muḥammad, Naṣb al-Rāyah li Aḥādīth al-Hidāyah ma‘a ḥāsyiyah Bughyat al-Alma‘ī fī Takhrīj al-Zayla‘ī (Beirut: Muassasah al-Rayyan li Tabā‘ah wa al-Nasyr).
Aliah, Mujadid Sigit, ‘Kontribusi Metodologis Pada Kajian Kritik Hadis Di UIN Alauddin Makassar: Suatu Pembacaan Awal’, Ihyaussunnah: Journal of Ulumul Hadith and Living Sunnah, 4.1 (2024), 18–40.
Amin, Kamaruddin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis, I (Jakarta: Hikmah (PT Mizan Publika), 2009).
Ansori, Ibnu Hajar, Hadis Ma’lul Dan Kehujjahannya (Kediri: IAIN Kediri Press, 2019).
Bedong, Abdul Gaffar, and Muhammad Ismail Maggading, Al-Jarh Wa Al-Ta’dil: Konstruksi Aplikatif Terhadap Penilaian Hadis, I (Yogyakarta: Bintang Pustaka Madani, 2021).
Faza, Asrar Mabrur, Hadis-Hadis Bermasalah Dalam Shahih Muslim Kritik Sisi Kontroversial Hadis (Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing, 2021).
Gaffar, Abdul, ’Ilal Al-Hadist: Kritik Kaidah Kesahihan Hadis (Kendari: SulQa Press, 2022).
Hanbal, Ahmad bin, Musnad Al-Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 1421)
Hendro, Beko, ‘Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Hadis Dalam Shahih Muslim Yang Dianggap Lemah Nasiruddin Al-Albani’, Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara, 3.2 (2021), 121–37.
Ibn Mājah, Abū ʻAbdillāh Muḥammad ibn Yazīd al-Qazwīnī, Sunan Ibn Mājah, ed. by Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn Al-Albani (Riyāḍ: Maktabah al-Ma’ārif li al-Naṡr wa al-Tauziy’).
Ilyas, Abustani, La Ode Ismail Ahmad, and Muhammad Yusuf Assagaf, Epistemologi Kritik Sanad: Antara Normativitas, Historisitas, Dan Aplikasi (Yogyakarta: Semesta Aksara, 2020).
Ismail, M. Syuhudi, Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telaah Kritis Dan Tinjauan Dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 2014).
’Itr, Nūruddīn Muḥammad, Manhaj Al-Naqd Fī ’Ulūm Al-Ḥadīṡ, Juz 1 (Sūrīyah: Dār al-Fikr Dimasyqi, 1997).
Lestari, Puput Dwi, ‘Kriteria Ittisal Al-Sanad Menurut Bukhari Dan Muslim Serta Transformasinya Di Kitab-Kitab Mu’tabarah’, Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis, 14.1 (2023), 61–72.
Luthfi, Hanif, Biografi Imam Muslim (Jakarta: Rumah Fiqih Publishing, 2019).
Marzuki, ‘Kritik Terhadap Kitab Shahih Al-Bukhari Dan Shahih Muslim’, Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 6.1 (2006), 26–38.
Muin, Munawir, ‘Pemahaman Komprehesif Hadis Melalui Asbab Al-Wurud’, ADDIN, 7.2 (2013), 291–306.
Nasir, Ridwan, and Khamim, Metode Takhrij Al-Hadith Dan Penelitian Sanad Hadis (Surabaya: Imtiyaz, 2015).
Rahman, Andi, Uji Autentisitas Hadis: Hadis Dan Telaah Otoritasnya Terhadap Syariat Islam (Banten: Darus Sunnah, 2022).
Setiawan, Ahmad Siddiq, Muhammadiyah Amin, and Muhammad Yahya, ‘The Hadith on the Recommendation Not to Perform Excessive Prayer in Sunan Ibn Majah: A Study of Conflicting Hadiths’, El-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Dan Integrasi Ilmu, 6.1 (2025), 1–12.
Tonang, Muhammad, Andi Rasdiyanah, and La Ode Ismail Ahmad, ‘Sistem Isnad Dan Kriteria Kesahihan Hadis’, Ihyaussunnah: Journal of Ulumul Hadith and Living Sunnah, 1.1 (2021), 64–77.
Wensinck, Arent Jan, Al-Mu’jam Al-Mufahras Li Alfāẓ Al-Ḥadīṡ Al-Nabawiy, ed. by Muḥammad Fuād ’Abd Al-Bāqiy, 2nd edn (Leiden: Maktabah Birīl, 1936).
Yahya, Muhammad, Subehan Khalik, and Ahmad Ziaul Haq, ‘Otentisitas Hadis: Telaah Kitab Al-Albani Silsilah Al-Ahadis Al-Dhaifah Wa Al Maudhu’ah’, Ihyaussunnah: Journal of Ulumul Hadith and Living Sunnah, 1.1 (2021), 29–44.
Yaqub, Ali Mustafa, Kritik Hadis, (Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2004).
———, Cara Benar Memahami Hadis (Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2019).
———, Imam Bukhari Dan Metodologi Kritik Dalam Ilmu Hadis (Banten: Maktabah Darus-Sunnah, 2021).
